The pardon granted former
Bayelsa Governor has not only attracted condemnation both at home and
abroad, it has compromised the war against corruption
President Goodluck Jonathan sent a wrong signal to Nigerians and the
international community last week with the state pardon granted to
former Bayelsa State Governor, Mr. Diepreye Alamieyeseigha. And in the
aftermath of what is now globally described as a classic blunder, the
federal government is seen as advertising its inability to set the right
tone for leadership while compromising its own avowed commitment to the
fight against corruption. Worse still, the fact that it also did not
check its own records (which led to an embarrassing second ‘pardon’ in a
few instances) has only confirmed the general suspicion that
Alamieyeseigha’s pardon was the sole objective of the entire exercise.
At a time most Nigerians seem enraged that those who steal public funds
to the tune of billions of Naira find it easy to escape justice; when
the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) is in court against
several politically exposed persons, the pardon granted the central
character in one of the few successful cases on which a conviction was
secured cannot but be demoralising.
While the president reserves the power to pardon repentant convicts,
such powers must at all times be judiciously exercised in the national
interest and on the side of natural justice, equity and good conscience.
The pardon of Alamieyeseigha does not in any way meet the above
criteria and has therefore diminished the president in the eyes of
Nigerians and the international community. It has also squashed the
image and credibility of the federal government.
It is more unfortunate still that the whole untidy issue was handled in
such an underhand manner. The last Council of State meeting had an
agenda showing that the matter of granting State Pardon to
Alamieyeseigha and others was scheduled for discussion. Yet at the end
of the meeting, Adamawa State Governor, Mr. Murtala Nyako, who addressed
the press on the proceedings and outcome, told Nigerians that it was
not discussed. He also conveyed the impression that no one was granted
State Pardon at the Council of State meeting he attended. Every
reference to State Pardon was strenuously denied until contrary claims
began to emerge – at first hazily.